‘Web of Mass Distraction’?

12 Sep 2004 (Sun)

conference n. A prearranged meeting for consultation or exchange of information or discussion (especially one with a formal agenda).Princeton Wordnet

People at a conference - Microsoft Office clipartATTENDED A TWO-DAY CONFERENCE on educational technology (ET) at Suntec City last Thursday and Friday. So much hard work, so many speakers and so many participants from so many countries. Somehow though, it ended on a note of disillusion at the closing forum.

One participant stood up and observed, “Elearning has not yet delivered its promise of a teaching and learning utopia. Instead, what we have seems to be a Web of mass distraction.” Everyone laughed.

Another guy said, “In our search for gold, let us not be discouraged or disturbed by the dirt we find.” The chairperson quickly responded, “Ok, let us thank….” and ended the conference.

conference n. An electronic meeting place dedicated to a particular subject where users come to participate in discussions or group projects… An electronic conference provides a many-to-many communication medium, as opposed to the person-to-person nature of e-mail. EE Link’s Glossary of Computing Terms

Net surfing - Microsoft Office clipartDURING the conference, other than a few enlightening sessions (such as two good keynote addresses and some HoD presentations on the use of online scaffolding to facilitate meaningful discussions among three primary schools), the usual thing happened. Most sessions turned out to be quite bland. While exhorting all to facilitate learning constructivistly, most presenters transmitted their knowledge (or findings) one-way while making lots of “motherhood” statements (obvious well-accepted cliches) about the need for constructivist teaching, benefits, and so on. Not walking their talk! The slides also left much to be desired — the words were often too small, too many; the graphics have too much details or are plain distracting.

IF i could organize the next ET conference (and have enough supporting resources — this is crucial because having organized much smaller conferences, i have some idea of how much work a conference can entail), i’ll make use of educational technology to enable speakers and participants to ‘conference’ with one another in a truly constructivist manner. Among other things, i would do the following:

1. Timing. Half the number of sessions and double the duration of each session to at least forty minutes.

2. Motherhood statements. Set aside a few introductory sessions on technology and pedagogy for those who are unfamiliar with educational technology. This shall be the only sessions where presenters are allowed to make “motherhood” statements.

3. Visual checklists. All presenters must go through checklists like Dr Bernie Dodge’s checklist for overall visual appeal.

4. Recordings. Pre-record all presentations (narrated PowerPoint, video unnecessary) or at least put all the PowerPoint slides online so that participants can preview and select sessions that meet their needs BEFORE the conference. Room sizes shall be allocated accordingly and not based on guesswork.

5. Real discussions. Actual conference sessions shall be used for topic-based discussions, and not for one-way transmissions, possibly using the “Progression” format (where based on a theme, several speakers host separate tables that each seats up to 10; participants join a table with a preferred topic, discuss with the speaker for about 20 minutes or so, and then move on to the next table with another topic).

6. Video conferencing. Include a video conferencing segment with one or more special overseas speakers.

7. Internet access. Put a few PCs with Internet access near registration booths and make them available for use by conference participants at a nominal fee.

8. Networking opportunities. Make it easier for participants to network with others who have similar experiences and/or interests, possibly through activities such as networking lunches or gaming, as well as online matching, discussion or polling.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Diigo
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MSN Reporter
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • PDF
  • Print
Similar Posts:

Posted by J.K. in Facilitation, Learning, Possibilities, Problems, Technology | View Comments |

  • http://blogs.clappingtrees.com JK

    Reposting some old comments made in 2004:

    Interesting ideas on “what if… you could organised your own conference” Joo Khim. Hope you had given your feedback to the organisers!

    Posted by: Tzy Peng on Fri Sep 17 04 4:10 pm

    Thanks, TP, for the suggestion. Had emailed one of the organizers but got no reply.

    Posted by: tree#138680 on Sat Sep 18 04 8:58 pm

    Hi, again.

    Belated update: Emailed the professor in charge one or two weeks ago and got a very positive response. Truly looking forward to the next conference now. :-)

    Posted by: tree#138680 on Wed Oct 20 04 11:37 pm

    Just for the record. Some belated notes on the three good presentations by HoDs during ICET 2004: All three primary schools made use of Knowledge Community forums (KCF) which support scaffolded conversations or discussions. Qihua Primary used an exploratory approach to discuss a Science topic, Planets. The question was: “Which planet would you visit and why?” Woodlands Primary used a content-based approach. Cannot remember the topic now. The last school was the most interesting — Shuqun Primary used a PBL (constructivist) approach. Students were grouped into fours to solve a problem online. The scenario is: Your good friend asks you for help to organize a birthday party with maximum turnout and within a budget of $400. The proposed date, time, venue, menu (with shark’s fin), etc. were given. The students discussed issues such as Muslims don’t eat pork, the time is too late for students, etc.

    What’s interesting are the built-in scaffolds which teaching staff can modify, such as [I need to understand], [my reflection], [my question], [I have evidence], etc. With these help, the students manage to construct meaningful questions, discussions and even debates (or challenges) without much (or even any) interference from their instructors. The students seem to enjoy the exercise a lot. Some posted more than 100 messages.

    Posted by: tree#138680 on Fri Nov 19 04 3:57 pm

  • http://www.medicaleducator.co.uk Sam

    I think elearning has been so badly neglected. For example when teaching medcial students how to pass exams and clinical finals there is literally nothing available that is of any quality.

    We’ve set up an elearning independent exam site at http://www.medicaleducator.co.uk.
    It all costs money to set up though…

  • http://www.ppt-to-video-converter.com Scott

    I really agree with what they said about e-learning becoming a mass distraction. I am a teacher myself and it is a real pain when you read nonsense in students’ assignments they found on the Internet.

blog comments powered by Disqus

sikis izle, porno izle, seks videolari, porno seyret,Turkce Pornolar, Yesilcam Pornolari, genc kiz Pornosu izle, Bedava sikis izle, seks izle, pornolar, liseli sikis, sikis, porno,adult video,adult sikis, Yesilcam Porno,

r57.txt, r57shell, r57 shell, r57, c99.txt, c99shell, c99 shell, c99.txt